Home > Review Process

Review Process

JBC follows a fair, transparent and rigorous peer-review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, impactful and ethical research in biodiversity and conservation.

Overview of the Review Process

Each submission is evaluated through a structured process to ensure scientific quality, rigor, originality and relevance.

1. Submission

The author submits the manuscript through our online submission system. A confirmation email is sent with in 24 hours.

2. Initial Screening

The editorial office checks the manuscript for scope, format, originality (plagiarism screening) and compliance with guidelines.

3. Editor Assignment

A suitable Associate Editor is assigned based on the subject area and expertise to oversee the review process.

4. Peer Review

The manuscript is sent to minimum two independent reviewers for double-blind peer review.

5. Decision

The Editor evaluates the reviews and makes a decision: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision or Reject.

6. Production

After acceptance, the manuscript moves to copy editing, typesetting and final publication.

Review Principles

1. Impartiality

Reviews are conducted objectively and without discrimination.

2. Confidentiality

Manuscripts and reviewer identities are kept strictly confidential.

3. Constructive Feedback

Reviewers provide clear, respectful and helpful comments to improve the manuscript.

4. Timeliness

We strive to provide the first decision within 2-4 weeks.

5. Author Proofing and Final Approval

Author must submit final version. Prior to publication, publisher will send galley proof to authors. No edits may be made after galley proofs are approved. All the online versions are citable by the digital object identifier (DOI).

Review Timeline

Initial Screening 1–5 days
Reviewer Invitation 3–7 days
Peer Review 1-2 weeks
First Decision 2-4 weeks (on average)
Revision (Author) 1-2 weeks
Final Decision 1–2 weeks after revision

After the Decision

For more details, please see our Editorial Policies.

We are committed to rigorous peer review and high ethical standards.

Thank you for your contribution to advancing biodiversity and conservation science.